In the US, media stories abounded of first-time mission trips, almost invariably to celebrate the hometown heroes. Many of these narratives extolled Haitian people’s spirituality and resilience, at times to justify less aid. The returning heroes, now newly-minted experts, spoke about the virtues of Christianity, of capitalist development, public health and hygiene, and limited representative democracy – all markers of assumed cultural and racial superiority. The collective residues of these stories justified, and naturalised, foreign control of the country.
The 'disaster narrative'
After the earthquake, the familiar language of Haiti being a “fragile” or “failed” state, which is among “the poorest in the hemisphere”, served to justify the need for foreign intervention as well as a convenient explanation for the limited progress of this intervention.
First, the discourse of a “weak state” served to justify foreign control of the process and near-total exclusion of Haitian people from it. Second, this exclusion, having roots in framing Haitian people out of the story and tropes of dehumanisation, led to practices and relationships wherein aid recipients felt treated like animals. Third, the disaster response was greatly influenced by the “photo op”, prioritising high-visibility and high-cost “solutions” at the expense of those more sustainable. Finally, a “blame game” led to increasingly severe responses, including increasingly violent forced evictions.
/https%3A%2F%2Fd1u4oo4rb13yy8.cloudfront.net%2F95231d2b-cab2-4f06-b093-bed35f96c6f9.jpg)
Media lessons for Nepal from Haiti: Don't let outsiders seize control of the narrative
Expressions like 'fragile state' and 'among the poorest nations' were used by foreign powers to take control of the disaster response in Haiti in 2010. Nepal shouldn't allow the same mistake.
Commenter cet article