Obama’s “War on Ebola” or War for Oil?

Publié par siel sur 6 Octobre 2014, 12:41pm

Obama a décidé d'envoyer 3000 soldats pour "combattre Ebola" dans des pays qui comme par hasard exportent du pétrole en Chine;

L'auteur de l'article,F. William Engdahl analyse cette nouvelle guerre d'Obama. Il rappelle que la patronne de l'OMS, Dr Margaret Chan, est la même personne qui avait créé cette panique autour de la " fièvre aviaire", laquelle avait enrichi les labos producteurs de vaccins.

(Le gouvernement français, rappelons-le, avait participé à ce montage en achetant une grande quantité de doses de vaccins dont plus de la moitié lui était restée sur les bras; la ministre de la santé d'alors avait proposé de revendre le stock d'invendu aux pays du Sud pour éviter de tout perdre- c'est-t-y pas beau la solidarité !)

L'auteur de l'article compare l'envoi des médecins cubains à celui de soldats US.

(Rappelez-vous que Haïti a eu droit au même scénario de débarquement de troupes uS en 2010, pour venir soit-disant en aide aux victimes du séisme. Troupes US bloquant l'arrivée des secours pendant les 3 jours qu'elles ont mis à s'installer à l'aéroport. Rappelez-vous aussi que, bizarrement, la Chine avait été le premier pays à arriver en Haïti où le pétrole serait, dit-on, en plus grande quantité qu'au Venezuela.

Maintenant, pourquoi exactement l'ONU recruterait en Haïti ? Quelles sont leurs intentions cachées ? Parce que, ce que raconte le Baron Duval du Nouvelliste sur la solidarité et gnangnangnan, ce n'est rien d'autre que du pipeau. Une dictée répétée à des fins purement de manipulation adressée à des gens qui croient encore au père Noël.

Pourquoi d'ailleurs ne pas recruter de préférence à la Jamaïque, Barbados, Trinidad, Bahamas, dans des pays anglophones ? Pour le Libéria et la Sierra Leone, ne serait-ce pas plus pratique ?

Si, dixit Duval, "partir n'est pas un problème"(sic), qu'il commence par montrer sa propre solidarité, qu'il s'en aille au Libéria en tant que journaliste faire des reportages sur la maladie, les victimes, l'organisation de la "guerre" contre le virus, avant de vouloir donner des leçons aux autres.

Certified Ebola Deaths?

The World Health Organization, under the Director, Dr Margaret Chan, in a press conference on September 13, sounded the alarm, warning that Ebola in west Africa was surging out of control. “In the three hardest hit countries, Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, the number of new patients is moving far faster than the capacity to manage them,” Chan claimed. WHO claims that almost half of 301 health-care workers dealing with alleged Ebola patients have themselves died, and that 2,400 people out of 4,784 cases in Africa have died of Ebola. On August 8, Chan declared the African Ebola situation a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” whatever that is supposed to mean.

A major problem for Chan and her backers, however, is that her Ebola statistics are very, very dubious. For those whose memory is short, this is the same Dr Margaret Chan at WHO in Geneva who was guilty in 2009 of trying to panic the world into taking unproven vaccines for “Swine Flu” influenza, by declaring a Global Pandemic with statistics calling every case of symptoms that of the common cold to be “Swine Flu,” whether it was runny nose, coughing, sneezing, sore throat. That changed WHO definition of Swine Flu allowed the statistics of the disease to be declared Pandemic. It was an utter fraud, a criminal fraud Chan carried out, wittingly or unwittingly (she could be simply stupid but evidence suggests otherwise), on behalf of the major US and EU pharmaceutical cartel.

In a recent Washington Post article it was admitted that sixty-nine percent of all the Ebola cases in Liberia registered by WHO have not been laboratory confirmed through blood tests. Liberia is the epicenter of the Ebola alarm in west Africa. More than half of the alleged Ebola deaths, 1,224, and nearly half of all cases, 2,046, have been in Liberia says WHO. And the US FDA diagnostic test used for the lab confirmation of Ebola is so flawed that the FDA has prohibited anyone from claiming they are safe or effective. That means, a significant proportion of the remaining 31 % of the Ebola cases lab confirmed through blood tests could be false cases.

The Obama Administration and Pentagon policy has continued that of George W. Bush who in 2008 created the US military Africa Command or AFRICOM, to battle the rapidly-growing Chinese economic presence in Africa’s potential oil-rich countries. West Africa is a rapidly-emerging oil treasure, barely tapped to date. A US Department of Energy study projected that African oil production would rise 91 percent between 2002 and 2025, much from the region of the present Ebola alarm.

Chinese oil companies are all over Africa and increasingly active in west Africa, especially Angola, Sudan and Guinea, the later in the epicenter of Obama’s new War on Ebola troop deployment.

If the US President were genuine about his concern to contain a public health emergency, he could look at the example of that US-declared pariah Caribbean nation, Cuba. Reuters reports that the Cuban government, a small financially distressed, economically sanctioned island nation of 11 million people, with a national budget of $50 billion, Gross Domestic Product of 121 billion and per capita GDP of just over $10,000, is dispatching 165 medical personnel to Africa to regions where there are Ebola outbreaks. Washington sends 3,000 combat tr

Obama's "War on Ebola" or War for Oil? Sending 3000 Troops to African "Ebola" Areas that Happen to Export Oil to China

For a Nobel Peace Prize President, Barack Obama seems destined to go down in history books as the President who presided over one of the most aggressive series of wars ever waged by a bellicose ...

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/10/05/obama-war-ebola-or-war-sending-africa-china.html