Point de presse du Département US sur Haïti : l'administration US maintient que les élections s'étaient parfaitement bien déroulées (mis à jour)

Publié par siel sur 18 Juillet 2016, 17:29pm

Catégories : #INTERNATIONAL, #REFLEXIONS perso

Point de presse du Département US sur Haïti : l'administration US maintient que les élections s'étaient parfaitement bien déroulées (mis à jour)

L'ONA devra prendre son mal en patience...

Le Nouvelliste.com - Site internet du Nouvelliste quotidien publi� � Port-au-Prince (depuis 1898) : National, International, Haïti, Economie, Culture, Sociét�,Sport, Editorial, Petites Anno...

http://lenouvelliste.com/lenouvelliste/article/160765/LONA-devra-prendre-son-mal-en-patience

Mon premier commentaire est une redite de ce que j'ai répété mille et une fois ( sans exagération ) sur ce blog : " Ce n'est pas quand les cabris sont hors de l'enclos qu'il faut crier de fermer la barrière". Que les Haïtiens - je parle des dirigeants, intellectuels et zentellectuels - ont développé un goût pour creuser des trous, sans prévoir d'échelles pour en sortir.

Parce que creuser un trou, ça tout le monde sait faire. Pas même besoin d'outils, les mains nues peuvent faire l'affaire.

Par contre, construire une échelle ça demande un minimum de connaissances : calculer la hauteur de l'échelle, l'espace entre les barreaux, s'assurer de la solidité de l'ensemble; et de moyens : le bois, la scie, les clous et autres. Et ça, ça demande un investissement en neurones, en argent .

Mezanmi, qui de ces parasites va prendre son temps pour consturire une échelle, alors qu'il suffit de lage, de lacher quelques gourdes entre les mains de pauvres gens pour qu'ils creusent avec leurs mains, creusent, creusent encore, jours et nuits, années après années jusqu'à être ensevelis.

La société haïtienne est pleine de trous et de routes barrées. Trous dans lesquels se retrouvent les plus pauvres. Routes barrées qui barrent l'accès à la connaissance du monde et à l'appréhension du bien collectif aux classes moyennes.

Le second commentaire découle du premier. De même, comme l'annonçait Martelly, que quand on laisse le bandit mettre un pied dans la porte, il s'empare de toute la maison. C'est ce qui s'est passé au cours de ces 5 années et que Latortue, un privilégié du régime woz/rakèt, feint de découvrir; que le Nouvelliste avec ses révélations tardives, nous la joue au Tartuffe qui tombe de haut.

Et les institutions internationales telles que la Banque mondiale, qui pendant 5 ans l'ont fermé et qui sont donc complices de la situation, se réveillent soudain pour déclarer que l'argent de l'Etat est mal dépensé et sans aucune transparence ni respect des normes légales.

Ce serait à croire qu'elles auraint été partie prenante du processus comme ce commentaire lelaisse entendre :

"Raju Singh, votre Banque Centrale et son adminstration ont prouve que pour Haiti, les représentants sont des mafieux, ou des nuls! et je me demande, si les detournements de fonds ne commencent pas a votre Banque Centrale. Cela fait 100 ans que vous aidez. On devient de plus en plus pauvres! Vous etes vous jamais penche sur cette tangeante? Putain! Aujourd'hui vous nous envoyez des alcoliques de tout accabit pour nous remonter la cravate! J'ai deux pour vous F$%$ Y##!"

Je ne comprends toujours pas que - même après lecture des excellents articles de L. Péan, L. Alin Hall, de L. Lodimus, Ezili Dantô et d'une petite poignée d'intellectuels, (que vous pouvez retrouver sur ce blog) qui proposent d'anlyser le présent, de construire le futur au regard du passé - comment la société haïtienne en est arrivée à un tel mépris d'elle-même qui la porte à la démolition plutôt qu'à la construction.

Je lis quotidiennement les bêtises de commentateurs tels que Rochord Roche, des JSudist, des Témoin Historique, des SPP, S. Lucas et autres qui se trouvent à des années lumières, pour ne pas dire dans une autre dimension que les réflexions de ces auteurs.

C'est comme si existait un monde parallèle administré, surveillé par des sortes de zombi - qui parleraient même une autre langue, celle de la grossièreté.

Comment expliquer un si extraordinaire décalage ?

Ce qui nous conduit au troisième commentaire. A savoir que étrangers - tous les étrangers- ont appris à mépriser, à manquer de respect à ceux qui n'en ont pas pour leur propre tête. L'expérience qu'ils ont faite en imposant Martelly à la tête de l'Etat, leur aura permis d'observer à quel point l'ensemble de la société haïtienne - en dehors d'une minorité - s'est soumise à la corruption, à la vulgarité, aux gouyades, aux carnavals, aux intimidations, aux vols des woz/rakèt, à leur irrespect total des lois.

Ce test qui s'est avéré, pour la CI, positif lui aura permis de monter le coup de l'élection de Jovenel Moïse - dont l'intérêt était de camoufler leur propre participation aux dysfonctionnements - et de poursuivre le plan élaboré par Collier (un nom qui, avouons-le correspond bien à l'objectif de remettre un collier au cou des ex-esclaves ) et de faire d'Haïti une plantation, un paradis fiscal, un hâvre pour les bandits internationaux.

Pourquoi le coup n'a pas marché ? La résistance populaire ? Le refus de Jude Célestin qui n'entendait pas être encore une fois le dindon de la farce ?

Les élections aux USA où il fallait protéger les 2 Clinton et ne pas trop mettre Haïti dans l'actualité et le rôle négatif qu'ils ont personnelement joué et qui a provoqué la situation de désordre ?

Ce qui expliquerait le regain d'hostilité des USA, ce serait la décision du FBI de ne pas poursuivre Mme Clinton. Plus rien à craindre de ce côté, qui aurait pu conduire à la Fondation des Clinton et à ...Haïti.

Les Haïtiens peuvent financer leurs élections. Il suffirait de créer un Fonds pour les élections auquel la diaspora serait appelée à participer .

Le seul hic. Qui gèrerait ce fonds ? Comment s'assurer que derrière un homme de bonne réputation ne se se cache pas un woz/rakèt ?

Le mépris développé et entretenu des Haïtiens pour eux-mêmes et leurs compatriotes a engendré une méfiance envers toute action collective, tout projet commun.

State Department: Daily Press Briefings : Daily Press Briefing - July 7, 2016

07/07/2016 06:46 PM EDT

John Kirby

Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing

Washington, DC

July 7, 2016

QUESTION: Haiti.

MR KIRBY: Okay.

QUESTION: Do you have anything on the suspension of the U.S. electoral assistance to Haiti? Has the U.S. suspended it?

MR KIRBY: So on Haiti, the U.S. Government has suspended its assistance toward completion of the presidential electoral process there. We made notification to government officials in Haiti on July 1st. Just in terms of context, the U.S. has provided over $30 million in assistance to the 2015 Haiti electoral cycle, and we did not plan funding for two more electoral rounds in 2016-2017, per the revised electoral calendar.

Suspension of U.S. electoral financial assistance does not signal a reduction in U.S. support for the people or development of Haiti; rather, we believe it allows us to maintain assistance in other priority areas such as health, economic growth, infrastructure. This decision enables the United States to retain vital humanitarian and development programs that help ordinary Haitians improve their lives.

QUESTION: Do you know when was the decision be made and then when will that take effect?

MR KIRBY: Well, look, as I said, we notified the government on July 1st. I can’t tell you the exact moment at which we made the decision. We notified on July 1st. But since April of 2016 we have highlighted the possibility of not funding new elections. This is a decision that has – we’ve been considering now for quite some time. When the actual decision was made I don’t know.

QUESTION: Is this a matter of not having the funds available to support a second round of elections, or is this the U.S. showing its displeasure with the Haitian decision to scrap the previous election results and start all over in October?

MR KIRBY: Look, as I said, it doesn’t signal a reduction of our support for the Haitian people. It will allow us to maintain assistance in other key priority areas, which we’ll continue to do.

QUESTION: No, but my question is very specific. A senior Administration official did indicate that the U.S. was not pleased with this decision to not redo the runoff but to go back to square one and start the election all over again.

MR KIRBY: We’ve made no bones about the fact that --

QUESTION: Is this a disapproval of the specific policy?

MR KIRBY: We’ve made no bones about the fact that we had concerns about the way the process was unfolding. And as I said, we had no plans – did not plan for funding for two more electoral rounds.

QUESTION: Was the U.S. surprised by the Haitian reaction to this decision?

MR KIRBY: I don’t think – I mean, there was no expectation that everybody in Haiti would appreciate or endorse this decision. But again, we believe it’s the sound thing to do, the right thing to do, for the people of Haiti in the long term.

QUESTION: In terms of maintaining diplomatic influence, is the U.S. in a way giving up leverage by withholding the electoral funds, or does the U.S. see that it has more influence over a recommitment to democratic principles and policies in Port-au-Prince?

MR KIRBY: I think it’s important to remember that we financially supported the 2015 elections, and those results we, the European Union, the Organization of American States all found to be credible. And as we said before, we regret that the Haitian Provisional Electoral Council chose to discount the 2015 presidential electoral results rather than complete those elections in a timely manner. And we continue to urge, as well as the rest of the international community, the Government of Haiti to hold credible and fair elections as soon as possible.

We have provided – in addition to what I said before, I mean, our own Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement has provided $2.8 million of equipment to support the Haitian National Police in terms of those October 2015 elections. We have spent a total of $33 million on the Haiti 2015 election cycle through those October 2015 elections.

And I would say since the 2010 earthquake through March 31st of this year, the United States Government provided $4.6 billion in relief, reconstruction, and development assistance in support of the Haitian people. I don’t think anybody in their right mind can question U.S. support for the Haitian people and for their efforts to rebuild and to recover and to move on. There’s absolutely no question about that. This wasn’t --

QUESTION: But are you concerned --

MR KIRBY: This isn’t about – this isn’t about leverage, Ros. This is about what we believe is in the best interests of the Haitian people and about being able to prioritize the assistance going forward on issues which we know they still need help with.

QUESTION: But you’re not concerned that because of the decision to scrap the previous election’s results that undemocratic principles may be coming into play within the Haitian political sphere?

MR KIRBY: No, these are decisions that the – these are decisions Haitian leaders have to make. And again, we’ve made clear what our concerns were about the electoral process thus far. We’ve been nothing but candid and forthright about that. But ultimately, these are decisions that they have to make, and we want to continue to urge them to make the right ones.

QUESTION: If they continue on a path that the U.S. Government really doesn’t favor, is the U.S. willing to reconsider its humanitarian aid?

MR KIRBY: We’re going to continue to prioritize the support in areas we believe are important to Haiti that – I don’t – I don’t foresee any change to U.S. support for the Haitian people in all manner of ways, and certainly economic assistance is one of them. And I think I’d leave it at that.

QUESTION: How much money is involved here? In other words, the decision not to fund additional kind of rounds of this election saves you how much money that you can then deploy --

MR KIRBY: It wasn’t – we didn’t plan for funding --

QUESTION: I know, but --

MR KIRBY: -- for two more rounds, so it’s difficult to put a dollar figure on that. But what I can tell you is that in the assistance for the 2015 electoral cycle was at – over – a total of over $30 million.

QUESTION: Yeah, you said 33 million, right?

MR KIRBY: Yeah.

QUESTION: But my question is you – I wouldn’t have asked you the question if you had just said, look, we didn’t plan for this and we’re not going to fund it. But you said you’re going to use the – that money for other things, right? And therefore it seems to me you must have some idea of how much money you’re not going to give them for this if you’re going to use it for other stuff, right?

MR KIRBY: I said it rather – it allows us to maintain priority assistance on things that we are already funding, so we’re going to continue that. I don’t have a dollar figure in terms of this because it wasn’t funded, it wasn’t budgeted. It would be impossible for me to make up that number.

QUESTION: So, but if you had funded it, you would have had to have taken it out of those other areas?

MR KIRBY: Not necessarily, but it’s certainly – not necessarily, but it does – but it certainly would have to be taken in consideration of the totality of the assistance that goes to Haiti.

QUESTION: So it would have had to have come out of total assistance from Haiti?

MR KIRBY: It is part and parcel – electoral support’s part and parcel of the aid and assistance that goes to Haiti.

QUESTION: Right.

MR KIRBY: And so certainly, in that regard, yes, it would come out of total assistance that goes to Haiti --

QUESTION: Right, but --

MR KIRBY: -- but I don’t – but again, we weren’t – we had not budgeted for this. I mean, we have to do – you have to forecast ahead --

QUESTION: Sure.

MR KIRBY: -- for even education assistance or disaster relief assistance. You have to have a budget going ahead.

QUESTION: Sure.

MR KIRBY: We did not budget for additional electoral cycles.

QUESTION: I get that, but --

MR KIRBY: So --

QUESTION: But if it wouldn’t necessarily come out of the hide of the other priority programs, I don’t see how you can – I mean, if you had said yeah, it would have come out of the other Haiti-related programs, I’d be like, okay, I understand that, fine. But you’re saying no, not necessarily, which implies you could have gotten money from elsewhere, which implies to me that it’s not actually coming out of Haiti.

MR KIRBY: We didn’t make those decisions, so it’s impossible for me to tell you exactly how much money would have come out of additional funding somewhere else or out of the existing budget for aid and assistance from Haiti.

QUESTION: Right, but if it didn’t – but if it wouldn’t definitely have come out of the other Haiti assistance – right – and you’re saying “not necessarily” --

MR KIRBY: Right.

QUESTION: -- then how can you argue this allows you to maintain your other priority funding, because maybe you could have maintained your other Haiti priority funding and gotten the money from another pot?

MR KIRBY: Because we’ve made a qualitative decision here that we’re going to continue to support Haiti going forward in these other areas --

QUESTION: Right.

MR KIRBY: -- and I can’t tell you with certainty that those other areas will see increases or not. They might.

QUESTION: Right.

MR KIRBY: I don’t know. But we didn’t budget for additional electoral support and we’re going to maintain our focus – as I said, we’re going to maintain our focus now on the other priority areas which we think are important to the Haitian people.

QUESTION: Right, but I don’t see how you can argue that the decision has been made so that you can maintain your priority funding elsewhere. It seems to me you’ve just made the decision, you don’t know where the other money might or might not come from.

MR KIRBY: No. Arshad, I’ll try this again.

QUESTION: Yeah, no, I’m not trying to be tendentious. I’m trying to understand it.

MR KIRBY: There are two factors here. One, we didn’t plan for additional electoral cycles.

QUESTION: Fine.

MR KIRBY: And we’ve already expressed our concern about additional electoral cycles.

QUESTION: Right.

MR KIRBY: And as I said, $33 million of U.S. taxpayer dollars were spent to help them with the 2015 electoral cycle because we think that’s important, and we thought it was important when they had a result and we would have liked to have seen that process go through to completion.

So we didn’t plan for 2016 or 2017 cycles and we’ve already stated where we are on the 2015 cycle. So we’re going to now focus – we’re not turning our back on the people of Haiti. My whole point of saying this was we’re not turning our back on the Haitian people, and the aid and assistance that we have in place will stay in place and we will examine whatever options are going forward in terms of additional assistance for other purposes. We just don’t – I don’t have any new decisions or announcements to make.

QUESTION: Okay. But the decision not to fund additional electoral expenditures is not because you want to protect the other funding, right? Because you’ve acknowledged it isn’t necessarily coming out of that funding. It’s for another reason. It’s because you’re just not going to support the electoral funding even though you’re definitely going to support all the other stuff.

MR KIRBY: It’s because we didn’t fund, we didn’t budget for 2016-27[1]. We have maintained a budget for other kinds of Haitian assistance --

QUESTION: Right, right.

MR KIRBY: -- and that’s going to continue.

QUESTION: And – but you have contingency funds of all kinds – of all sorts, right? And you’re choosing not to go into any other contingency funds to fund the Haiti election, to not fund additional Haiti --

MR KIRBY: We did not budget – we did not – I don’t think I can say it any differently. We did not budget for additional electoral rounds and we are now – we’re going to continue to prioritize and maintain the priorities – the word I use, “maintain” the priority on assistance – other assistance that we give to the Haitian people.

QUESTION: (Inaudible) ask for additional aid --

QUESTION: And why not – just last one from me, please: Why not try to find extra money somewhere for – I know you didn’t budget for it. I also know $33 million is not an inconceivably huge amount of money. I mean, it’s a lot of money, but I’m sure that if you wanted to find another 5 or 10 million or whatever it was, you probably could have found it somewhere. Why --

MR KIRBY: Because we believe the assistance that we are providing in other areas are put to better use for the Haitian people.

QUESTION: But it’s not coming out of that money.

MR KIRBY: I’ve answered the question, Arshad. I don't know how I can do it any other way.

Ros.

QUESTION: Well, let me ask it this way: Did the Haitians try to bargain with the U.S. for getting some sort of electoral assistance?

MR KIRBY: I don’t talk --

QUESTION: Did they ask and did the U.S. say no?

MR KIRBY: I’m not going to get into the details of diplomatic conversations.

QUESTION: Can we move on?

Précédent Suivant

Commenter cet article

Registre theodore

18/07/2016 14:11

Siel paret tt kow vakabon sangine wap defann sansal ou pedisa san wont asasen brilet kaotyo sispan vole tel moun ou menm ak papaw jn Daton leger nou boule lekol pou eleksyon pafet c pa d bagay moun nou pa vole sanjwen krimil ou pa we wa ekri sou yn blog menm bon non w ou paka bay ou ka bay moun leson ou fome nan kile lekol ou pase eskew k ekri kreol ou menm ou panse ou k fe moun leson nan ekri kreol tet w pabon tande vole ou menm ak tt chen parey ki nan pouvwa privet ki c ansyen asasen kite fe masak lasiri nan st marc pot prizon ouvri pou nou anko bann prizonye ki sove nan prizon san moun nan menm nou manyen wont non chen 2 pye sa bann kochon wap defann yo fe apre matelly fin ale ou pawe c kob yap bay depute pou manje pwason poutan tt lopital leta an grev mechant sanwont manje ate padi mesi apre repons souw gen nen nan figiw wa femen bek w kochon c pa moun tankou pouw panse ou k bay leson al bay chen parey ou konn peye al devan palman pou al mande boule palmante chen anko padon bondye ( dim kounyea ki fot ou we kreol mw genyen vwayou non selman mw pale lang sa yo pibyen pasew mw ekri yo pi byen pasew c pa sa ki enpitan pou mw paret tt kor chen anko)

Répondre

siel

18/12/2016 23:16

Ou fin fou nèt.

siel

18/07/2016 17:36

M. Registre Théodore, comme je vous l'ai dit auparavant, et votre français et votre créole sont in-com-pré-hensibles . Vos phrases n'ont ni point, ni virgule. Et quant au contenu...!!! Il faudrait un docteur de la tête (un pyschiatre donc) pour l'interpréter... Ca a tout l'air du délire de quelqu'un qui s'est échappé d'un asile de fous. "Apre repons souw gen nen nan figiw wa femen bek w kochon c pa moun tankou pouw panse ou k bay leson al bay chen parey ou konn peye al devan palman pou al mande boule palmante chen anko padon bondye..." Auriez-vous oublier de prendre vos médicaments ? Gade sa, mèt la, mwen deja di-ou gen trôp bèt pou ou pèdi tan ou ap gaspiye tout kolokenn joure ak betiz ou gen nan makout ou a. Se youn richès pou ou pataje avek moun ki sôti nan menm ras avek ou, ki gen menm edikasyon, ki savan, ki gen anpil konesans tankou ou. Mwen menm mwen konsilyan, mwen toleran, mwen panse tout moun se moun, analfabèt pa vle di bèt. Mwen kite ou di tout pawol tèt an ba ou yo. Cependant, chak moun gen limit li. Pa-m lan rive lè ou tonbe nan di betiz.. Mwen pa renmen salte, li pote maladi. Jan mwen te di ou li : al fèt wout. Fwa sa -a ma pe ajoute : pa vire. Epi, m ap tout anonse ou : prochen repons ou a m ap efase-l . Se pa sansire ma p sansire, se menjaj ak pwopte ki pou fèt. Es ke ou konprann ?

JULMISTE YONEL

18/07/2016 05:06

Salut, mwen vle pou bagay rasis sa aaa fini nan lemond sur tous pour les Haïtiens.

Répondre

Registre theodore

17/07/2016 21:35

Il y a une phase que ma mère m' a appris c' est apprendre à consommer l' echec "c' est dans ce cas là que se retrouve les ignorants comme vous et ceux de la classe politique haitienne que tu pretend etre le defenseur moi j'ai aucun probkeme par le fait que tu as dit que je suis un imposteur woz oui je le suis je preferais d'etre un imposteur woz au lieu etre un incendier un criminel qui tue les journalistes ex jn Dominique jacques Roche etc voilà ce que tu defends de maniere tres bête actuellement en haiti ces criminels sont au pouvoir regards comment il se comportent tu te sens bon Comment les gens meurt jours et nuits tu es dans ta peau méchant tu ne voudrais pas aller aux elections avec matelly parce que tu sais pertinament que tu perdrais apres ta defaite piteuse aux elections tu mets des voyous dans les rues de la capital por dire les elections ne sont pas bonnes ensuite apres tout ce là tu crée une commission bidon avec des pseudo intellectuels qui produisent une soit disant rapport avec des fautes grammaticales tu n' as rien dit vwayou tu estime que je ne maitrise pas les deux langues à savoir le francais et le creole pourtant tu defend un rapport truffé de fautes bêtes et remplir de faiblesses metodologiques je te conseil petit et je te suggere de prendre tres au serieux ce conseil ce qui est important dans une langue c' est la comprehension .

Répondre

siel

17/07/2016 23:30

M. Registre Théodore , franse la pa pi bon. Mwen pa reyisi konprann ki lang ou kon ekri. Angle ? En tous les cas, peut-être que vous savez lire . Où avez-vous vu que je défends la classe politique haïtienne ? "et ceux de la classe politique haitienne que tu pretend etre le defenseur " J'ai écrit ceci : "... pra l konsidere ki oposisyon, ki tèt kale-bandi legal-woz, tankou moun pou tout bon ?" " je te conseil petit et je te suggere de prendre tres au serieux ce conseil ce qui est important dans une langue c' est la comprehension ." Admettons. Mais qu'est-ce qu'on fait quand ni la forme ni le fond n'y sont ? Se dwa pa ou pou ou masakre lang ayisyen. Ou mêt masakre lang franse a tou. Sak pa kontan anbake ! sa ou ekri tout samble soti nan sèvo an moun kap delire, Se konsi telman tèt li cho cho ke pawôl la bloke tanku an plak reye. Jean Dominque...Jean Roche... commission bidon... pseudo intellectuels et bla, bla. Sa ou konnen de "faautes bêtes" et de "faiblesses met(h) )odologiques ?" Gade sa, gran, suspann fè jako repèt. Gen an blan franse ki rele Boileau ki te di ti fwaz sa -a : "Ce qui se conçoit bien s'énonce clairement. Et les mots pour le dire arrivent aisément." E pawôl sa a valab pou nenpôt ki lang : franse, kreyol, angle, panyôl, chinoua, e latriye. An gran save tankou ou, pa gen dwa gaspiye tan li avek an ignoran. Mwen konprann sa byen. Se pou sa map sipliye ou, pase chimen ou, al fè rout ou kote li meyô pou kapasite entelektyièl ou.

registre theodore

17/07/2016 13:32

haitien fin fe malprote yo epi ya akize etranger c komsi etranger c ak sel haiti yap kollaborer ,yn pays chaje moun ki nan presse c tigrangou yo ye san fomation gade moun ki t konpran konmante Daly vallet au srieux kounyea lap koloborer ak yn regime ki san fondement juridique mw pran sa kom exemple mw t k pran yn paket ki fe 5 ap anmekde regime Matelly a ap pran poze demokrat kounyea tout moun anba yo tt net c san pide san karate vwayou etc . pays a san statut actuellement sur le plan international tet van yo fe konmsi yo pa we poutan grangou mize na kormalere pou yo c sak ki politik la bann tyol privet .

Répondre

siel

17/07/2016 16:01

oh la la ! M. Théodore Registre Nan ki lang wap ekri ? Sa ki charabya sa -a ? Pa fè an manje kochon avek kreyol epi franse. Chak lang gen ôtograf pa l. Franse pa ekri tankou laten mènm si li sôti de lang sa-a. Si ou pa konn ekri kreyol, ekri franse, si ou pa konn ekri franse ekri angle, si ou pa konn ekri angle, ekri pangol; Si ou pa kapab, fini avek bagay ekri a. Joure pa vle di gen lespri se an bagay moun woz yo pa ka konprann. Pito ou pose pou ou ka mete lide ou kôm il fo. "gade moun ki t konpran konmante Daly vallet au srieux kounyea lap kolobore ak yn regime ki san fondement ..." Rejim tèt kale ke wap defann- la, li te an rejim san fondman, se Clinton ki te mete l la. Li te si telman san fondman, M. Boulos voye an mèl pou Mme Mills pou di l konsa kijan li reyisi fè Preval aksepte pou l pa kite Jude Celestin nan kous la, pou Mateli pran plas li. Opont di se pa resilta CEP te remèt li, CI vinn pibliye. Impostè woz yo konsidere lot moun yo tankou impostè. Li lojik ke zôt an chimè. Ci, UE ak USA fè tousa yo kapab pou zôt,"bandi legal" yo, ka kontinye nan piyaj ak krim. Pandan 5 an yo asiste zôt tankou dè ti bebe. Yo ba zôt lèt vach, bouyi, akasan ak siro myel, yo dodinen zôt. Nou finn abitye avek " traitements de faveur", tankou Duvalier papa ak pitit, zôt te konprann blan an te ba nou wou lib "à vie." Zôt ap mandye karès blan epi zôt ap joure Ayisyen . Zôt pas men kapab respekte tèt zôt, respekte lang peyi a, epi zôt vle blan an ki te rele zôt avan "les comédiens", ki kounyean rele zôt " les joueurs", ki te choizi pou zôt, an prezidan ki te konn montre kilôt tanga li tout kote, pra l konsidere ki oposisyon, ki tèt kale-bandi legal-woz, tankou moun pou tout bon ?

Point de presse du Département US sur Haïti : l'administration US maintient que les élections s'étaient parfaitement bien déroulées (mis à jour)

Partager cet article

Vous aimerez aussi :

Commenter cet article